proofs
Provedattentionrelative-tailfinite-stochastic-computationinformation-complexity

Maintained finite attention with sharp relative-tail accuracy and work

For all n∈N\htmlData{mx=1}{n \in \htmlData{mx=0}{\mathbb{N}}}, m∈N\htmlData{mx=1}{m \in \htmlData{mx=0}{\mathbb{N}}}, q,R,F,epsilon∈R\htmlData{mx=1}{q, R, F, \mathit{epsilon} \in \htmlData{mx=0}{\mathbb{R}}} and k,v:Fin⁡ n+1→R\htmlData{mx=6}{k, v : \htmlData{mx=3}{\htmlData{mx=0}{\operatorname{Fin}}\,\htmlData{mx=2}{\htmlData{mx=1}{n} + 1}} \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=5}{\to}} \htmlData{mx=4}{\mathbb{R}}}, if 0<m0 \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=1}{<}} \htmlData{mx=0}{m}, 0≤q0 \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=1}{\leq}} \htmlData{mx=0}{q}, q≤R\htmlData{mx=0}{q} \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=2}{\leq}} \htmlData{mx=1}{R}, 0≤F0 \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=1}{\leq}} \htmlData{mx=0}{F}, 0<epsilon0 \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=1}{<}} \htmlData{mx=0}{\mathit{epsilon}}, ∀j, 0≤k(j)∧k(j)≤1\htmlData{mx=9}{\forall j,\ 0 \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=3}{\leq}} \htmlData{mx=2}{\htmlData{mx=0}{k}(\htmlData{mx=1}{j})} \mathbin{\htmlData{mx=8}{\land}} \htmlData{mx=6}{\htmlData{mx=4}{k}(\htmlData{mx=5}{j})} \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=7}{\leq}} 1} and ∀j, ∣v(j)∣≤F\htmlData{mx=6}{\forall j,\ \htmlData{mx=3}{\left\lvert \htmlData{mx=2}{\htmlData{mx=0}{v}(\htmlData{mx=1}{j})} \right\rvert} \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=5}{\leq}} \htmlData{mx=4}{F}}, then

(let⁡(D))(:= polynomialDeadline n R let H := relativeCopies m R F epsilon let r := uniformRow n let a := polynomialAccept q R k let c := storedPolynomialControl m q (momentSums m (List.ofFn (fun j : Fin (n+1) => (k j,v j)))) let o := softmaxOutput q k v let y := finiteAccepted (sharpAccepted m q k v c) o D let law := rejectionWeight r a D (∀ z, 0 ≤ copiesWeight law H z) ∧ Finset.sum Finset.univ (copiesWeight law H) = 1 ∧ mean (copiesWeight law H) (average y H) = o ∧ mse (copiesWeight law H) (average y H) o ≤ epsilon2ˆ ∧ mean (copiesWeight law H) (relativeQueryWork m H D R) ≤ 15∗(m : R)+8+(H : R)∗(6∗Real.exp R+10∗(m : R)+22)))\htmlData{mx=3}{(\htmlData{mx=2}{\htmlData{mx=0}{\operatorname{let}}(\htmlData{mx=1}{D})})(\mathtt{:=\ polynomialDeadline\ n\ R\ let\ H\ :=\ relativeCopies\ m\ R\ F\ epsilon\ let\ r\ :=\ uniformRow\ n\ let\ a\ :=\ polynomialAccept\ q\ R\ k\ let\ c\ :=\ storedPolynomialControl\ m\ q\ (momentSums\ m\ (List.ofFn\ (fun\ j\ :\ Fin\ (n+1)\ =>\ (k\ j,v\ j))))\ let\ o\ :=\ softmaxOutput\ q\ k\ v\ let\ y\ :=\ finiteAccepted\ (sharpAccepted\ m\ q\ k\ v\ c)\ o\ D\ let\ law\ :=\ rejectionWeight\ r\ a\ D\ (\forall \ z,\ 0\ \leq \ copiesWeight\ law\ H\ z)\ \text{∧}\ Finset.sum\ Finset.univ\ (copiesWeight\ law\ H)\ =\ 1\ \text{∧}\ mean\ (copiesWeight\ law\ H)\ (average\ y\ H)\ =\ o\ \text{∧}\ mse\ (copiesWeight\ law\ H)\ (average\ y\ H)\ o\ \leq \ epsilon\^2\ \text{∧}\ mean\ (copiesWeight\ law\ H)\ (relativeQueryWork\ m\ H\ D\ R)\ \leq \ 15*(m\ :\ \text{ℝ})+8+(H\ :\ \text{ℝ})*(6*Real.exp\ R+10*(m\ :\ \text{ℝ})+22))})}
What the notation means · or point at any symbol
NNatural numbers
The natural numbers 0, 1, 2, …. In Lean they start at 0. (ℕ)
<Less than
0 is strictly smaller than m. (0 < m)
RReal numbers
The real numbers: every point on the number line. (ℝ)
x ∈ TVariables
q, R, F, epsilon range over real numbers: the statement must hold for every choice. ((q R F epsilon : ℝ))
≤At most
0 is less than or equal to q. (0 ≤ q)
Fin
Fin: a definition from the library, not special notation. Its name is its meaning; open it in Lean to see how it is defined. (Fin)
f(x)Function application
Fin applied to n + 1. Lean writes f x; papers write f(x). (Fin (n+1))
⟹Implies
If Fin(n + 1), then ℝ. (Between types, A → B is the type of functions from A to B.) (Fin (n+1) → ℝ)
x : TVariables
k, v range over Fin (n+1) → ℝ: the statement must hold for every choice. ((k v : Fin (n+1) → ℝ))
∀For all
The statement after the comma holds for every j. (∀ j, 0 ≤ k j ∧ k j ≤ 1)
let
let: a definition from the library, not special notation. Its name is its meaning; open it in Lean to see how it is defined. (let)
+Addition
n plus 1. (n+1)
∧And
Both hold: 0 ≤ k(j), and k(j) ≤ 1. (0 ≤ k j ∧ k j ≤ 1)
|x|Absolute value
The size of v(j) without its sign. (|v j|)

Complete finite maintained original-softmax estimator with an exact relative Taylor certificate. The actual moment sums are constructed from keys and values, certificate arithmetic is charged once per query, and capped sampling, averaging and dense completion are included. Exact-real billing model; no executable RAM or floating-point claim.

How it was proved

Proved
8 October 2026
By
Ajax
Checked by
Lean's kernel (Lean 4.33.1, with Mathlib); the proof is signed and replays offline
Axioms
Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext
Proof
21 lines of Lean
Sign in to see the proofThe proof, its signed report and its history.

More proved statements