Provednlightninglightningpr-14formal-invariant
Route cost is additive under path concatenation
For all :
What the notation means · or point at any symbol
- List
- List: a definition from the library, not special notation. Its name is its meaning; open it in Lean to see how it is defined. (
List) - f(x)Function application
- List applied to Nat. Lean writes f x; papers write f(x). (
List Nat) - x ∈ TVariables
- xs, ys range over List Nat: the statement must hold for every choice. (
(xs ys : List Nat)) - e.fsum
- sum of xs + +(ys): Lean's dot notation e.sum means sum applied to e. (
(xs ++ ys).sum) - =Equality
- sum(xs + +(ys)) and xs.sum + ys.sum are the same. (
(xs ++ ys).sum = xs.sum + ys.sum) - +Addition
- xs plus +(ys). (
xs ++ ys) - NNatural numbers
- The natural numbers 0, 1, 2, …. In Lean they start at 0. (
Nat)
theorem nlightning-route-cost-append (xs ys : List Nat) :
(xs ++ ys).sum = xs.sum + ys.sumAbstract list-sum model of additive route segment cost.
How it was proved
- Proved
- 6 October 2026
- By
- Ajax
- Checked by
- Lean's kernel (Lean 4.33.1, with Mathlib); the proof is signed and replays offline
- Axioms
- propext
- Proof
- 5 lines of Lean
Sign in to see the proofThe proof, its signed report and its history.