proofs
Provedunbiased-gradientstrainingfirst-principles

Depth variance price: if e_0 = 0 and e_{d+1} ≤ 2σ + 2Λ e_d, then e_D ≤ 2σ·Σ_{k<D}(2Λ)^k, so the whole-network level constant is exponential in depth when 2Λ > 1

For all e:N→R\htmlData{mx=3}{e : \htmlData{mx=0}{\mathbb{N}} \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=2}{\to}} \htmlData{mx=1}{\mathbb{R}}} and σ,Λ∈R\htmlData{mx=1}{\sigma, \Lambda \in \htmlData{mx=0}{\mathbb{R}}}, if 0≤σ0 \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=1}{\leq}} \htmlData{mx=0}{\sigma}, 0≤Λ0 \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=1}{\leq}} \htmlData{mx=0}{\Lambda}, e(0)=0\htmlData{mx=1}{\htmlData{mx=0}{e}(0)} \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=2}{=}} 0 and ∀d, e(d+1)≤2σ+2Λ⋅e(d)\htmlData{mx=14}{\forall d,\ \htmlData{mx=3}{\htmlData{mx=0}{e}(\htmlData{mx=2}{\htmlData{mx=1}{d} + 1})} \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=13}{\leq}} \htmlData{mx=12}{\htmlData{mx=5}{2\htmlData{mx=4}{\sigma}} + \htmlData{mx=11}{\htmlData{mx=7}{2\htmlData{mx=6}{\Lambda}} \cdot \htmlData{mx=10}{\htmlData{mx=8}{e}(\htmlData{mx=9}{d})}}}}, then

∀D, e(D)≤2σ⋅∑k=0D−1(2Λ)k\htmlData{mx=13}{\forall D,\ \htmlData{mx=2}{\htmlData{mx=0}{e}(\htmlData{mx=1}{D})} \mathrel{\htmlData{mx=12}{\leq}} \htmlData{mx=11}{\htmlData{mx=4}{2\htmlData{mx=3}{\sigma}} \cdot \htmlData{mx=10}{\sum_{k=0}^{\htmlData{mx=5}{D} - 1} \htmlData{mx=9}{(\htmlData{mx=7}{2\htmlData{mx=6}{\Lambda}})^{\htmlData{mx=8}{k}}}}}}
What the notation means · or point at any symbol
NNatural numbers
The natural numbers 0, 1, 2, …. In Lean they start at 0. (ℕ)
⟹Implies
If ℕ, then ℝ. (Between types, A → B is the type of functions from A to B.) (ℕ → ℝ)
x ∈ TVariables
σ, Λ range over real numbers: the statement must hold for every choice. ((σ Λ : ℝ))
≤At most
0 is less than or equal to σ. (0 ≤ σ)
f(x)Function application
e applied to 0. Lean writes f x; papers write f(x). (e 0)
=Equality
e(0) and 0 are the same. (e 0 = 0)
∀For all
The statement after the comma holds for every d. (∀ d, e (d + 1) ≤ 2 * σ + 2 * Λ * e d)
RReal numbers
The real numbers: every point on the number line. (ℝ)
+Addition
d plus 1. (d + 1)
·Multiplication
2 times σ. (2 * σ)
∑Summation
Add up (2 · Λ)^k for k = 0, 1, …, D − 1. (∑ k ∈ Finset.range D, (2 * Λ) ^ k)
aᵇPower
2 · Λ raised to the power k. ((2 * Λ) ^ k)

Closed form of the induction behind the Lipschitz finite-terminal MLMC training theorem: iterating the level-error propagation inequality (own sampling error σ per stage, Lipschitz constant squared ≤ Λ) over D stages gives e_D ≤ 2σ(1 + 2Λ + … + (2Λ)^{D−1}). This is the honest variance price of exactly unbiased dense-objective gradients: linear in depth when 2Λ ≤ 1, exponential otherwise. First-principles reformulation, 2026-10-05.

How it was proved

Proved
5 October 2026
By
Ajax, with the agent “Baguette math & proofs (Claude Code, 2026-10-03)”
Checked by
Lean's kernel (Lean 4.33.1, with Mathlib); the proof is signed and replays offline
Axioms
Classical.choice, Quot.sound, propext
Proof
23 lines of Lean
Sign in to see the proofThe proof, its signed report and its history.

More proved statements